Back in the day when I hadn't yet discovered the joys of heartbreak, my standards of attractiveness were quite different. I was so awkwardly shy that the bottom line was: if they were patient enough to try to befriend me (made difficult by the fact that I was near-mute) then they qualified.
They also had to be cooler than me and older. Not hard as I was unashamedly and resolutely non-fashionable.
Surprisingly, my first boyfriend was into fashion, a photographer, that sort of thing. His saving grace was that he was considered marginally try-hard and his short boyishness cut him off from people his own age in his circle. He began my tailoring of criteria:
kind, slightly goofy, bilingual, worldly, music
bad: not challenging, too passive
Then I went careering the other way, with a 100% British, footie mad Geordie. But I found him funny and good looking. Setting up my next set:
Nice arms, smiley eyes, light hearted
Bad: Hated reading/good music/culture, slightly controlling, very flirty with other women to the point of cheating.
Then my ex-fiancee:
Outdoorsy, likes cooking, loves me, enthusiasm/passion for something, prone to grand gestures, unafraid to talk
Bad: toooooo intense, bit obsessive/possessive, too hairy/manly
Then Scotsman, back to light heartedness:
Me loving them, looking good in a kilt (i.e. good legs), musical/musician, nice arms (again)
Bad: very disengaged, ambitionless
M:
Deep, into almost as many things as I am, travelling bug, highly intelligent (provides a welcome challenge), highly musical, sensitive, physical. Good dancer. Appreciated La Traviata *melt*...
Bad: bit too prone to crying, depressive
So what can we infer from this. This is what I'm after:
-Nice arms- forearms especially, must be subtley sculpted. Musicians and mountain climbers often get the type I like.
-Musical- ppreciating good music, playing an instrument helps too
-Tall - at least my height if not a good 10cm more
-Nice eyes - smiley ones. You know, the ones which look like you're honestly smiling and you can't help them crinkling at the corners.
-Good teeth
-A good voice - No lisp, not too squeaky. An accent is a-ok especially if it implies that they speak a second (or third etc) language.
-Intelligence/intellectual curiosity - I'm kind of liking the run of Ph.Ds I've had in my time. It implies a passion for something and ambition, also they tend to go hand in hand with a love of culture (in my experience)hence the intellectual curiosity.
-Kindness - kind of goes without saying but I wouldn't say the Geordie was kind. The others were.. they don't need to be sensitive but a certian levle of empathy wouldn't go amiss.
-Light heartedness - I loved M the most when he felt comfortable enough to be silly and funny. I loved all of them the most when they made me laugh. Being goofy is fine too, as long as it's just a character thing and doesn't translate to not being able to dance.
-Thinking I'm special and vice versa. Kind of obvious but say, with the Geordie and the Scotsman, neither of them appreciated me because my qualities weren't those they would cherish. Similarly my ex fiancee loved me for superficial reasons and resented the undercurrent that M, V and subsequent dates/potentials have otherwise loved.
-Being able to appreciate nature/outdoors. Having been brought up half and half city girl/country girl I appreciate nature. I like the peace, the robustness and reality of the outdoors. I hate climbing mountains but I love walking/running for miles- even camping is fun.
-An egalitarian. The South African hounding me for a third date at the moment is a good pointer- he still thinks women are inferior but concedes they deserve equality. V believed certain women 'ask for it' when they wear a short skirt and get drunk. D the ex-F wouldnt touch a woman who'd been with more men than he'd had women. The list goes on.. None of these opinions are attractive and I won't stand for them.
I'm leaving the rest flexible.. I will allow leniency for the benefit of a spark/other inexplicable physical connection.
Now to track 'em down...